|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
With the increase in data plan price, $10 more per month for 24 months is $240 + $199 = $439... this is essential the cost of the new iPhone.
|
|
|||
|
Welcome to the data world that all of us using BlackBerrys and WinMo phones have been living for a long time. The only reason it has increased to $30 a month is because it is now classified as a smartphone instead of a feature phone.
It is just inline with At&t's other smartphone/PDA/BlackBerry Personal data plans. |
|
|||
|
I guess the iPhone is no longer the apple of AT&T's eyes anymore..
It was cool in the past year because it seemed like though the iPhone itself was expensive, the "iPhone Plan' was paving a way for very affordable unlimited data plans complete with SMS. It's really saddening to see AT&T place such a grip on the iPhone and stripping what once made the iPhone unique. The iPhone is now just a phone in the carrier lineup..nothing more |
|
|||
|
I would agree c4sizzle. It's now just a normal "PDA" in the lineup.
I just hope they don't treat it "special" and restrict which phone I can use my SIM in for data if that's the case. If this is how it is, then please no special treatment. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Blogging |
|
|||
|
VZW would rape you in a similar fashion. Been there, done that.
On the bright side, I get a cell allowance monthly, so should be able to fit a reasonable voice plan in with $30/month for data and come in under budget. If ActiveSync works like it did on my WinMo devices with VZW, then it'll be a snap to link up to my company's exchange server. They probably won't be deploying iPhones (yeah, cheap arse bastards who won't put most people on BES anymore) but actively encourage employees to use WinMo devices to access company email remotely (a.k.a. we aren't paying for more BES licenses, etc.). I'll wait and see the details on Exchange integration and if it'll be as simple as it was with the MotoQ and T700wx. Don't see any reason why not - activesync is activesync no matter which platform it's running on? |
|
|||
|
Yup, that is exactly what it is turning out to be. I'm ok with that, it keeps stuff simple. One less play for AT&T to deal with. One less specific contract for AT&T to deal with (since there is no more revenue sharing).
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|